|
From: | Dmitry Gutov |
Subject: | Re: Renaming eglot -- or at least add an alias? |
Date: | Fri, 7 Oct 2022 15:03:36 +0300 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.2.2 |
On 07.10.2022 14:48, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2022 14:38:34 +0300 Cc:rms@gnu.org,ams@gnu.org,emacs-devel@gnu.org From: Dmitry Gutov<dgutov@yandex.ru>We could put them alongside EDE's and Semantic's menu entries. Or maybe instead, given that EDE is not the recommended choice for "Project Support" anymore, and we don't usually recommend Semantic to new users either.Or we could make the EDE/Semantic menus have a sub-menu, whereby the user could select which kind of "support" they want.That depends on whether we want the menus to present an "intro" to Emacs functionality that doesn't require much reading to pick the right choice. IMHO that can be the best goal for the menu bar. But you might have a different understanding of its role.Something to revisit at a later date, I think. Too many things are still in flux: Eglot, tree-sitter... The functionalities overlap, and at least I personally don't yet have a clear idea of how to make the best "mix".
IIUC tree-sitter will be used by specific major modes that implement the integration. Some will just do that from the outset, and some might have user options to toggle.
But if those options are featured in the menu bar, they probably will be in the major mode's menu, not inside Tools.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |